Documentation Index
Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://docs.helix-db.com/llms.txt
Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further.
For the complete documentation index optimized for AI agents, see llms.txt.Every system makes design choices. Helix Cloud optimizes for durable, cost-effective graph, vector, and text workloads with strong transactional guarantees. These choices have implications.
Excels At
| Area | Details |
|---|---|
| Durable storage | All data persists in object storage. No risk of data loss from local disk failure. Storage capacity scales independently of compute. |
| Read scalability | Readers auto-scale horizontally. Doubling readers doubles read throughput with no coordination overhead. |
| Serializable transactions | Every query runs against a stable snapshot with ACID semantics by default. |
| Mixed graph, vector, and text workloads | Graph traversals, vector search, and full-text search execute in the same transaction, against the same snapshot. No need to stitch together separate systems for those workloads. |
| Cost efficiency at scale | Object storage is significantly cheaper per GB than local SSDs or in-memory stores. Large datasets remain affordable. |
| Operational simplicity | Single writer eliminates distributed consensus. No leader election, no split-brain, no quorum management. |
Not Optimal For
| Area | Details |
|---|---|
| Sub-millisecond reads | Cache hits are fast, but cold reads require an object storage round trip. Workloads that require guaranteed sub-millisecond latency on every read are better served by in-memory databases. |
| Ultra-low write latency | Writes incur object storage latency for durability. Write throughput is high, but individual write latency has a floor set by object storage round-trip time. |
| Exhaustive vector recall | Vector search is approximate (ANN). Applications that require 100% exact nearest neighbor results should use brute-force search on smaller datasets. |